State Bridge Profile Arkansas 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile Arkansas 2016
State Bridge Profile Arkansas 2016 2016-02-29T09:46:52+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

Arkansas Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]
  • Of the 12,853 bridges in the state, 845, or 7%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
  • 2,012 bridges, or 16%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.
  • Federal investment in Arkansas has supported $1.3 billion for capital improvements on 671 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 1,175 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 76 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/statepdf/ARTBA%20Arkansas%20Bridge%20Profile%202016.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;” custom_margin=”15px|||” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on % of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”36″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”25″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
Pulaski1961123,000Urban InterstateI-30 Log 141.70 over Union Pacific RR at 1.1 mi S ofI-40(I-8)
Pulaski1936123,000Urban minor arterialLocust St/ S Ft Rd over U.P.R.R. at 1.20 mi S of I 40
Pulaski195856,000Urban InterstateI 30-Sec 23 over SH1 SH10 RR Ark Riv at 1.2 mi S Jct I-40
Pulaski197752,500Urban InterstateI-630 WB Log 5.48 over Miss Ave, Rushing Creek at 1.7 mi E of I-430
Pulaski197752,500Urban InterstateI 630 EB Log 5.48 over Miss Ave, Rushing Creek at 1.7 E of I-430
Pulaski196045,500Urban InterstateI 30-WB Log 138.29 over Frontage Rd & U.P.R.R. at Biddle S .6 mi S 365
Pulaski195841,000Urban freeway/expresswayUS 67-Sec 10, SB over Redmond Rd., UPRR at 8.60 mi N Jct of I - 40
Pulaski195841,000Urban freeway/expresswayUS 67-Sec 10 NB over Redmond Rd., UPRR at 8.60 mi N of I 40
Crittenden197340,000Urban InterstateI 40-Sec 52 over Miss Rvr, Cr, Ci St, RR at 4 mi E Jct I-55 & I-40
Craighead197334,000Urban freeway/expresswayUS 49 over R.R. ditch at 1.94 mi N Jct US 63-49
Pulaski196032,000Urban freeway/expresswayUS 67 NB Log 9.07 over Main St., Jacksonville at 9.07 mi N I-40
Pulaski195832,000Urban freeway/expresswayUS 67 SB Lanes over Main St., Jacksonville at 9.08 MI N Jct of I -40
Prairie196830,000Rural InterstateI 40 over White River at 3.7 MI W Jct SH 33
Saline195828,500Rural InterstateI-30 WB Log 113.95 over Saline River Relief at 2.7 mi SW of SH 5 @ Bento
Saline195828,500Rural InterstateI-30 EB Log 114.38 over Saline River at 2.6 MI SW SH 5 at Benton
Saline195828,500Rural InterstateI-30 EB Log 113.96 over Saline River Relief at 2.7 mi SW of SH 5 @ Bento
Saline195828,500Rural InterstateI -30-Sec 22 WB over US 67-9 Log 7.61 at 3.0 mi SW SH 5 @ Benton
Pulaski195827,000Urban freeway/expresswayUS 67 NB Log 10.89 over SH 161 at Lraf Base Exit
Pulaski195827,000Urban freeway/expresswayUS 67 SB Log 10.89 over SH 161 at Lraf Base Exit
Pulaski197725,500Urban InterstateI-440 EB Log 3.80 over Lindsey Road at 3.7MI E of US 65
Pulaski197725,500Urban InterstateI 440 WB Log 3.92 over Lindsey Road at 3.7 mi E of US 65
Pulaski197924,000Urban InterstateI 440 EB Log 7.11 over US 165-Sec 9,RR at 2.6MI So of US 70(I-7)
Pulaski197924,000Urban InterstateI 440 WB Log 7.11 over US 165-Sec 9, RR at 2.6MI So Ofus 70-(I-7)
Pulaski198022,000Urban freeway/expresswaySh440 Es Ramp10.39 over I-40 Log 158.77 at 1.9MI W of Galloway (I-6)
Sebastian196921,000Urban InterstateI 540-Sec 1, WB Ln over SH 255-Sec 3 at 0.73 So Jct SH 45
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate512583,9028,970,8441233,196242,000
Rural arterial1,1141,055,5996,730,6252433,704133,920
Rural minor arterial1,236662,9413,778,0025546,288175,384
Rural major collector3,9341,235,8514,173,36722674,168243,841
Rural minor collector1,094233,217293,21510612,42621,152
Rural local road3,048495,247468,62834842,99838,868
Urban Interstate380961,62413,627,21013131,681528,000
Urban freeway/expressway139260,6812,821,100128,722281,200
Urban other principal arterial364403,7805,013,2401849,181230,200
Urban minor arterial405233,7152,777,9751418,869187,199
Urban collector16257,864700,196195400
Urban local road465107,753698,399163,88713,769
Total12,8536,292,17450,052,800845455,2152,095,933
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement1,867$2,303.57,168,712785,438
Widening & rehabilitation54$20.4272,24335,186
Rehabilitation627$307.91,959,979327,281
Deck rehabilitation/replacement17$1.575,27812,153
Other structural work19$3.25,1374,282
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X