State Bridge Profile California 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile California 2016
State Bridge Profile California 2016 2016-02-29T09:57:32+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

California Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]
  • Of the 25,318 bridges in the state, 2,009, or 8%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
  • 4,419 bridges, or 17%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.
  • Federal investment in California has supported $10.0 billion for capital improvements on 2,363 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 1,036 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 521 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/statepdf/ARTBA%20California%20Bridge%20Profile%202016.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;” custom_margin=”15px|||” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on % of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”30″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”10″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
Orange1969328,000Urban InterstateInterstate 5 over El Toro Road at 12-ORA-5-18.69-LGNH
Los Angeles1959296,000Urban InterstateInterstate 405 over Olympic Blvd at 07-LA-405-30.18-LA
Los Angeles1960294,000Urban InterstateInterstate 405 over Mcdonald Street at 07-LA-405-26.45-CLC
Los Angeles1963294,000Urban InterstateInterstate 405 over Sepulveda Blvd at 07-LA-405-25.46-CLC
Orange1959286,000Urban InterstateInterstate 5 over Aliso Creek at 12-ORA-5-17.75-LGNH
Los Angeles1957283,000Urban InterstateInterstate 405 over Constitution Ave at 07-LA-405-31.90
Los Angeles1962274,000Urban InterstateInterstatee 405 over Sepulveda Blvd at 07-LA-405-38.59-LA
Los Angeles1960273,760Urban InterstateInterstate 110 over Dominguez Channel at 07-LA-110-9.13-LA
Los Angeles1950270,000Urban freeway/expresswayState Route 110 over 1st Street at 07-LA-110-23.34-LA
Los Angeles1948265,000Urban freeway/expresswayAlvarado St Sep over Route 101 at 07-LA-101-2.86-LA
Los Angeles1963253,000Urban InterstateRoute 405 over Woodruff Ave at 07-LA-405-1.64-LBCH
Los Angeles1960253,000Urban InterstateInterstate 110 over Redondo Beach Blvd at 07-LA-110-11.24-LA
Los Angeles1960253,000Urban InterstateInterstate 110 over Gardena Blvd at 07-LA-110-10.49-LA
San Diego1964245,000Urban InterstateInterstate 5 over Carmel Valley Rd at 11-SD-5-R32.90-SD
Los Angeles1960243,000Urban InterstateInterstate 110 over 168th Street at 07-LA-110-10.32-LA
Los Angeles1960242,820Urban InterstateInterstate 110 over Alondra Blvd at 07-LA-110-10.74-LA
Orange1968240,000Urban InterstateInterstate 405 over San Diego Creek Channel at 12-ORA-405-6.41-IRVN
Orange1962239,000Urban freeway/expresswayState Route 55 over Santiago Creek at 12-ORA-055-13.42-ORA
Contra Costa1998235,000Urban InterstateInterstate 680 over Monument Boulevard at 04-CC-680-R17.70-PLHL
Sacramento1971231,000Urban freeway/expresswayU.S. Highway 50 over 39th Street at 03-SAC-050-R0.85-SAC
Alameda1956230,000Urban InterstateInterstate 880 over Whipple Road at 04-ALA-880-13.67-HAY
Orange2008229,000Urban freeway/expresswayState Route 22 over Harbor Blvd at 12-ORA-022-R7.83
Alameda1951217,000Urban InterstateInterstate 880 over UP RR, San Leandro Creek at 04-ALA-880-24.18-SLN
Los Angeles1956216,600Urban InterstateInterstate 10 over Sunset Ave at 07-LA-010-34.85-WCOV
Los Angeles1975216,600Urban InterstateInterstate 10 over W Covina Parkway at 07-LA-010-34.46-WCOV
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate1,2111,300,15130,988,83074256,4752,056,100
Rural arterial1,3691,294,24920,955,12468113,4291,129,297
Rural minor arterial1,487993,8437,547,42593109,527440,391
Rural major collector2,170960,6875,908,477248145,502587,420
Rural minor collector1,210401,9381,413,10714741,907161,233
Rural local road4,0221,055,6543,054,250440111,817214,325
Urban Interstate2,6287,878,163272,308,19277424,5069,645,230
Urban freeway/expressway3,0746,768,900209,245,136125368,1728,861,145
Urban other principal arterial2,3893,600,21758,653,660254581,6536,388,307
Urban minor arterial2,5973,028,70736,971,160250328,1243,719,004
Urban collector1,364911,6759,071,97010977,306748,689
Urban local road1,7971,085,8588,211,11212491,422625,860
Total25,31829,280,042664,328,4482,0092,649,84034,577,000
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement688$2,387.33,177,376393,401
Widening & rehabilitation164$447.23,197,481142,071
Rehabilitation1,867$4,945.055,026,5592,975,120
Deck rehabilitation/replacement238$1,405.79,049,328621,280
Other structural work1,339$3,504.129,360,2881,698,113
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X