State Bridge Profile Florida 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile Florida 2016
State Bridge Profile Florida 2016 2016-02-29T10:01:21+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

Florida Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]
  • Of the 12,198 bridges in the state, 251, or 2%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
  • 1,760 bridges, or 14%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.
  • Federal investment in Florida has supported $3.2 billion for capital improvements on 758 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 1,205 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 574 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/texasstatebridgeprofile.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;” custom_margin=”15px|||” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on % of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”49″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”42″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
Duval1959147,000Urban InterstateFuller Warren Bridge
Miami-Dade1968104,000Urban freeway/expresswaySR 836 EB over NW 72nd Avenue at 0.5 miles east of SR 826
Escambia196051,831Urban other principal arterialPensacola Bay Bridge
Okaloosa196450,508Urban other principal arterialUS98 SR30 over ICWW & Brooks St. at 0.5 mi. east of SR85
Duval197250,500Urban freeway/expresswaySR-202 (JTB) over Mill Dam Branch at 2 mi. E. of US-Alt-1
Hillsborough198144,300Urban freeway/expresswaySR-618 WB over US41B (22nd St) & CSX RR at 1.0 mi east of Nebraska Ave
Broward195738,000Urban minor arterialSR-838 over Middle River at .5 miles east of US-1
Broward194935,000Urban other principal arterialE/B S.R. 842 over North Fork New River at 0.25 miles east of I-95
Miami-Dade196729,450Urban freeway/expresswaySR 836 On Ramp over NW 12th Street at Ramp from SB SR 826
Bradford194827,500Urban other principal arterialUS-301 (SR-2) over Alligator Creek at 0.5 mi. S of SR-1
Duval195727,000Urban minor arterialSR-115 over Trout River at SR-115 over Trout River
Okaloosa197125,500Urban minor arterialSr189 Beal Parkway over Five mile Bayou at 3.1Miles N. of US98, SR30
Escambia196525,500Urban minor arterialSr289 over Carpenters Creek at Pensacola
Duval196122,250Urban InterstateI-10 WB (SR-8) over CSXrr at 0.1 Mi. E. of US-301
Miami-Dade195121,216Urban minor arterialNe123rd St. over Intracoastal W/Way at 0.8 miles east of US-1
Volusia195419,575Urban minor arterialOrange Avenue over Halifax River at 0.4Mi. west of SR-A1A
Palm Beach198219,000Urban other principal arterialWB Pga Blvd. over Intracoastal Waterway at 10 W of Sr5 & E Ofsr811
Miami-Dade194418,936Urban other principal arterialEB Rickenbakercswy over Biscayne Bay at 1Ft.South of Toll Plaza
Clay201118,700Urban local roadPlantation Oaks Bv over N. Prong Double Branch at .1 mi east of Br #714059
Volusia196918,301Urban InterstateI-95 over Spruce Creek at I-95 SB - Spruce Creek
Volusia196918,301Urban InterstateI-95 NB over Spruce Creek at I-95 NB - Spruce Creek
Santa Rosa195318,000Rural minor arterialUS90 SR10 over White River at 1.4MI E of County Line
Santa Rosa195318,000Urban minor arterialUS90 SR10 over Simpson River at 9.5MI E. of Co. Line
Santa Rosa195118,000Rural minor arterialUS90 SR10 over Bass Hole Cove at 2.2MI east of County Line
Santa Rosa194017,800Urban minor arterialUS90 SR10 over Macavis Bayou at 0.5MI E.of Blackwater Riv
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate610761,05813,049,67016650
Rural arterial1,0361,224,1258,544,448746,36335,900
Rural minor arterial600590,0103,222,3621629,47897,225
Rural major collector792451,7551,919,017267,87929,322
Rural minor collector567219,994952,756235,65823,170
Rural local road1,513324,8911,629,1889536,34523,610
Urban Interstate1,2573,952,25172,997,504430,057205,852
Urban freeway/expressway1,1932,405,16938,902,416410,004228,250
Urban other principal arterial1,2863,131,78331,671,2448110,710220,125
Urban minor arterial1,0932,150,22418,892,8481963,220297,931
Urban collector1,045717,7959,292,3111429,21884,028
Urban local road1,206547,6764,239,1193427,882112,271
Total12,19816,476,731205,312,880251397,4791,357,684
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement199$1,874.2966,638279,237
Widening & rehabilitation63$46.3484,54747,174
Rehabilitation72$92.0543,600127,450
Deck rehabilitation/replacement4$1.6136,40024,759
Other structural work439$188.89,429,7562,079,114
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X