State Bridge Profile Hawaii 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile Hawaii 2016
State Bridge Profile Hawaii 2016 2016-02-29T10:02:55+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

Hawaii Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]
  • Of the 1,142 bridges in the state, 60, or 5%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
  • 435 bridges, or 38%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.
  • Federal investment in Hawaii has supported $1.0 billion for capital improvements on 236 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 20 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 10 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/statepdf/ARTBA%20Hawaii%20Bridge%20Profile%202016.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;” custom_margin=”15px|||” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”41″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″ title=”Based on % of Structurally Deficient Bridges”] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”48″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
Honolulu1938211,528Urban InterstateHalona St over Kapalama Canal at 0.29 mi E/Houghtailing St
Honolulu194980,780Urban other principal arterialNimitz Hwy over Kapalama Canal (E.B) at 0.25 mi SE/Waiakamilo Rd
Honolulu193274,765Urban other principal arterialNimitz Hwy over Nuuanu Strm (W.B) at 0.06 mi E/Awa St
Honolulu193465,342Urban freeway/expresswayKal Hwy over Niu Strm at 0.11 mi W/Niuiki Circle
Honolulu196941,908Urban other principal arterialFarr Hwy over Waiawa IC #3B FAI-H1 at 0.60 mi E/Waipahu St Sep
Honolulu196337,533Urban other principal arterialFarr Hwy over Ulehawa Strm at 0.08 mi W/Mohihi Rd
Kauai194536,515Rural InterstateKuhio Hwy over Wailua River at 0.16 mi NE/Leho Dr
Honolulu195935,233Urban other principal arterialLikelike Hwy over Kaneohe Str Dbl 10X8 CBC at 0.08 mi E/Kahekili Hwy
Honolulu196730,446Urban other principal arterialFarr Hwy over Maipalaoa Strm at 0.05 mi W/Maipalaoa Rd
Honolulu194930,446Urban other principal arterialFarr Hwy over Mailiilii Strm at 0.20 mi W/Alapaki St
Kauai193627,145Urban InterstateKaumualii Hwy over Nawiliwili Str/Lihue M at 0.16MI SE/Haleko Rd
Honolulu193723,098Urban other principal arterialFarr Hwy over Kaupuni Strm at 0.04MI W/Kaupuni St
Kauai193819,155Rural minor arterialKaumualii Hwy over Hanapepe River at 0.07MI SE/Hanapepe V Rd
Kauai193317,615Urban minor arterialKuhio Hwy over Hanamaulu Strm(Kapaia) at 0.10MI NE/Wailua Falls Rd
Honolulu192215,039Rural arterialKam Hwy over Waiahole Strm(County) at 0.04MI S/Waiahole Vlly Rd
Kauai192812,108Rural major collectorKoloa Rd over Waikomo Strm(Koloa Br) at 0.07MI E/Poipu-Koloa Jct
Honolulu193211,688Rural arterialKam Hwy over Kaipapau Strm at 0.01MI SE/Pipilani Pl
Honolulu193211,688Rural arterialKam Hwy over Waipilopilo Strm at 0.03MI SE/Imua Pl
Honolulu193010,801Rural arterialKam Hwy over Paumalu Strm at 0.19MI NE/Kenui Rd
Honolulu197610,190Urban InterstateQuarry Access Rd over 3-84Rcp Culvt at Kapaa Quarry Acc Rd A-1"
Honolulu19269,914Rural arterialKam Hwy over Waimanana Strm at 0.02MI SE/Pokiwai Pl
Honolulu19759,543Urban collectorKomo Mai Dr over Komo Mai Dr/Drainage Cnl at Tmk=9-8-2-09
Honolulu19346,710Rural minor arterialKaukonahua Rd over North Poamoho Strm at 0.05MI S/Hukilau Loop
Kauai19135,555Rural major collectorKuhio Hwy over Waikoko Strm at 0.MI Nw/Kumu Rd
Kauai19125,555Rural major collectorKuhio Hwy over Waipa Strm at 0.49MI Nw/Kumu Rd
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate27244,1211,074,95611,46336,515
Rural arterial7733,530991,560584159,130
Rural minor arterial181102,4081,421,413132,27932,829
Rural major collector12825,944410,118112,59140,713
Rural minor collector317,07089,93943111,622
Rural local road11116,17870,6033514590
Urban Interstate186747,33913,929,57942,366253,863
Urban freeway/expressway8976,9473,321,674152065,342
Urban other principal arterial9868,8893,386,323107,628364,145
Urban minor arterial4129,342748,741144117,615
Urban collector7019,418446,968227412,093
Urban local road10320,627246,72255346,571
Total1,1421,391,81326,138,5966019,762891,028
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement6$2.1780933
Widening & rehabilitation2$0.5795255
Rehabilitation4$0.98,08020,617
Deck rehabilitation/replacement34$51.5484,2647,940
Other structural work1,066$1,101.524,996,5901,281,703
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X