State Bridge Profile Illinois 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile Illinois 2016
State Bridge Profile Illinois 2016 2016-02-29T10:17:46+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

Illinois Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]
  • Of the 26,674 bridges in the state, 2,244, or 8%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
  • 1,959 bridges, or 7%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.
  • Federal investment in Illinois has supported $4.7 billion for capital improvements on 3,384 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 2,459 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 378 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/statepdf/ARTBA%20Illinois%20Bridge%20Profile%202016.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;” custom_margin=”15px|||” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on % of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”27″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”7″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
DuPage1960145,900Urban InterstateI- 55 over Lemont Rd at 1.5 mi NW Will County
Cook1963140,400Urban freeway/expresswayIL 53 NB over Kirchoff Rd at 0.5 mi S Euclid
Cook1963140,400Urban freeway/expresswayIL 53 SB over Kirchoff Rd at 1.7 mi N I-90
DuPage1970134,800Urban InterstateI-290 over Salt Creek at 0.6 mi NW of IL 83
St. Clair1963114,100Urban InterstatePoplar Street Bridge
Will1955103,100Urban InterstateI- 55 over Joliet Rd at 2 mi E of IL 53
Cook1933100,900Urban other principal arterialLake Shore Drive over Wilson Avenue at 46 N & 732 W
Cook193396,700Urban other principal arterialLake Shore Drive over Lawrence Ave at 48 N & 7 W
Cook196477,600Urban InterstateI- 55 WB Stevenson over RR - BNSF at 0.6 mi E US 45
Cook196477,600Urban InterstateI- 55 EB Stevenson over RR - BNSF at 0.6 mi E US 45
Cook195863,650Urban InterstateI90 EB (NW Toll) over Ill 62 (Oakton St) at I90 at Ill 62 P5
Cook195863,650Urban InterstateI90 WB (NW Toll) over Ill 62 (Oakton St) at I90 at Ill 62 P5
Cook196559,600Urban InterstateI- 55 WB Elevated over ML King Dr, Rmp,Etc at 1.3 mi E I-94
Cook196559,600Urban InterstateI- 55 EB Stevenson over ML King Dr,Ramp,Etc at 1.3 mi E I94
DuPage195058,900Urban other principal arterialIl 83 over Marion Hills/63rd St at 0.09 mi N of 63rd St
Tazewell195856,600Urban InterstateI-74 over Ill Riv (604034P) at I-74 over Illinois R
Madison196652,300Urban InterstateFai 270 over Mississippi River at N. of Granite City
Cook195651,600Urban other principal arterialIl 64 (North Ave) over Des Plaines River at 1 mi W IL 43
Cook192744,300Urban other principal arterialCicero Ave over Sanitary Ship Canal at 40 S & 48 W
St. Clair198143,500Urban InterstateFai 255 over Ill 15 at 1.3 mi S of State St
Kane196043,100Urban freeway/expresswayUS 20 By Pass over Fox River at 0.3 mi W IL 25
St. Clair198043,000Urban InterstateFai 255 over Southern Railway at .5 M So Ill 15
St. Clair198043,000Urban InterstateFai 255 over Ill 163 at Fai 255 over Ill 163
Cook195942,800Urban other principal arterialUS 20 over Poplar Creek at 0.26 mi E Kane Co
Cook196442,200Urban other principal arterialIl 171 NB First Av over I- 55 Stevenson at 1.4 M SW IL 43
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate878750,0028,684,3255860,114476,325
Rural arterial842508,7113,834,8754632,948227,125
Rural minor arterial1,485693,8963,762,725133104,077321,275
Rural major collector3,6561,130,8933,557,535238105,224240,850
Rural minor collector848189,254322,1006111,93124,750
Rural local road12,1641,981,0661,448,6361,069117,089102,204
Urban Interstate1,4292,877,93758,214,87693292,1172,398,975
Urban freeway/expressway187247,9485,715,0501115,696517,600
Urban other principal arterial1,4162,073,20729,919,824128263,8852,652,675
Urban minor arterial1,3471,264,42112,728,355117133,7761,161,635
Urban collector1,068751,1074,903,470112117,704565,335
Urban local road1,354495,6631,300,77517859,015143,330
Total26,67412,964,105134,392,5442,2441,313,5768,832,079
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement1,821$8,677.811,998,1491,395,533
Widening & rehabilitation308$366.24,045,930360,325
Rehabilitation478$504.15,622,917505,716
Deck rehabilitation/replacement66$138.33,797,175156,377
Other structural work155$182.92,028,590248,563
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X