State Bridge Profile Maine 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile Maine 2016
State Bridge Profile Maine 2016 2016-02-29T10:09:36+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

Maine Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]

  • Of the 2,431 bridges in the state, 361, or 15%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
  • 470 bridges, or 19%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.
  • Federal investment in Maine has supported $859.7 million for capital improvements on 618 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 193 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 79 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/statepdf/ARTBA%20Maine%20Bridge%20Profile%202016.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;” custom_margin=”15px|||” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on % of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”9″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”37″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
Cumberland195627,415Rural InterstateI-95 over Piscatiqua River Str#28 at 0.567 mi W of SR 1&26
Cumberland195627,415Rural InterstateI-95 over Piscatiqua River Str #31 at 0.095 mi NE of Hurricane
Cumberland195925,360Urban InterstateI 295 Southbound over Route 88 at 1 mi N US1
Cumberland195923,580Urban InterstateI-295 Northbound over Route 88 at 1 mi N US 1
Cumberland198923,336Urban other principal arterialRoutes 9 & 22 over Stroudwater River at 0.6 mi NE of SW Jct 9&22
Cumberland195622,850Urban InterstateI-95 (NB) over Stroudwater River at 0.158 mi W of Jetport Rd
Somerset196022,839Rural InterstateI-95 over Route 201 at 2 mi N Townline
Penobscot195918,010Urban InterstateI-395 (Ind Spur) over Webster Avenue at 0.3 mi E of I-95
Sagadahoc195817,778Urban freeway/expresswayUS Rte # 1 over SMO RR - city streets at 0.1 mi E of Jct Rte 209
Lincoln193117,383Rural arterialRoute US 1 over Montsweag Brook on Townline
Penobscot195216,931Urban minor arterialStilwater Ave. over S Chan Stillwater River at .7 mi N. I-95
Penobscot196016,568Urban other principal arterialRoute 222 over Interstate 95 interchange #47
Cumberland196116,054Urban minor arterialRoute 24 (Maine St over US 1 at 0.2 mi S of Topsham T.L.
Penobscot196215,670Urban InterstateI-95 Southbound over M C RR & Perry Rd at 0.2 mi SW of I95 / I395
York193315,170Urban minor arterialUS 1 Elm St over Saco River (N of E Chan) at Biddeford-Saco T L
Kennebec191813,966Urban minor arterialRoutes US 201 & 9 over Cobbossee Stream & Stree at 0.1 mi N Jct Water St.
York192813,770Rural minor arterialRoute US 1 over Kennebunk River at 1.1MI N Jct Rte 9A & 35
York195813,660Urban minor arterialRoute 4 over Mousam River at 0.5 mi NE Jct 4A & 109
Cumberland195813,170Urban collectorBridge Street over Presumpscot River at 0.1 mi N Jct Rte 25
Waldo193412,112Urban other principal arterialUS 1 & 3 over Goose River at 1.7 MI E 3
Penobscot196112,050Rural Interstate95 NB over Souadabscook Stream at 2.5 MI E Tl/ 95 MI 177.1
Penobscot196112,050Rural InterstateI 95 NB over Souadabscook Stream at 3.3 mi E Tl / 95 MI 177.9
Penobscot196112,050Rural Interstate95 NB over Souadabscook Str at 2 mi E Tl/95 mile 176.5
Cumberland191611,420Urban minor arterialSpring Street over Stroudwater River at 1.2 mi S Jct Rte 25
Cumberland192210,840Rural minor arterialRte US202, 4, 1 over Collyer Brook at 0.7MI S of New Gloucester
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate176129,3571,811,077106,301137,564
Rural arterial13798,0801,011,908146,81182,843
Rural minor arterial18797,048990,0362614,124124,774
Rural major collector453161,332984,1616119,902118,395
Rural minor collector26669,721315,448379,12953,419
Rural local road753126,396350,98415416,02535,415
Urban Interstate116179,2872,548,56464,844110,220
Urban freeway/expressway1933,545269,45414,12217,778
Urban other principal arterial5790,686794,55462,89281,563
Urban minor arterial82133,3671,014,125128,145121,832
Urban collector10461,171596,518177,942107,402
Urban local road8121,989104,223175,43318,069
Total2,4311,201,97910,791,052361105,6701,009,274
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement338$775.0979,473126,068
Widening & rehabilitation296$76.51,088,128108,485
Rehabilitation140$28.1760,84588,826
Deck rehabilitation/replacement0$000
Other structural work0$000
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X