State Bridge Profile Minnesota 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile Minnesota 2016
State Bridge Profile Minnesota 2016 2016-02-29T10:38:55+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

Minnesota Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]

  • Of the 13,301 bridges in the state, 810, or 6%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
  • 375 bridges, or 3%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.
  • Federal investment in Minnesota has supported $2.4 billion for capital improvements on 871 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 1,582 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 44 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/statepdf/ARTBA%20Minnesota%20Bridge%20Profile%202016.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;” custom_margin=”15px|||” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on % of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”37″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”26″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
Ramsey1965148,000Urban InterstateI 35E over Cayuga St & BNSF RR at 0.9 mi N of E Jct TH 94
Ramsey193885,000Urban freeway/expresswayTH 36 over Lexington Ave(CSAH 51) at 1.0 mi east of Jct TH 51
St. Louis196959,000Urban InterstateI 35 SB over unstable material at Jct TH 535 & 35
St. Louis197059,000Urban InterstateI 35 over unstable material at 0.3 mi N of Garfield Ave
St. Louis196959,000Urban InterstateI 35 NB over unstable material at Jct TH 535 & 35
Hennepin196748,500Urban InterstateI 35W SB over TH 65 NB at 0.7 mi S of Jct TH 94
Hennepin196542,000Urban InterstateI 494 NB over CP Rail at 2.5 mi N of Jct TH 55
Hennepin196542,000Urban InterstateI 494 SB over CP Rail at 2.5 mi N of Jct TH 55
Hennepin193936,000Urban other principal arterialTh 7 (CSAH 25) over TH 1 at Jct TH 1 & 7
Ramsey196128,500Urban other principal arterialTh 5 (West 7 St) over Miss River & City St at 2.1 mi SW of Jct TH 51
Winona196726,000Rural InterstateI 90 over Mississippi River at Minn/Wisc State Line
Sherburne194123,300Urban other principal arterialUS 10 over Elk River at 2.7 mi W of Jct Th 169
Ramsey192821,500Urban minor arterialMsas 158(Kllgg EB) over Ravine(At St. Peter St.) at 0.3 mi W of Jct Th52
Polk196320,740Urban other principal arterialUS 2 over Red River at N Dakota State Line
St. Louis197220,000Urban other principal arterialUS 53 over 19th & 20th St Conn at The Jct Th 53 & 23
Hennepin192720,000Urban minor arterialCsah 158(Vernon A) over CP Rail at 0.1 mi E of Jct Csah 20
Hennepin197919,474Urban minor arterialCsah 15 over Browns Bay-Tanager Lk Ch at 0.9 mi NE of Jct Csah 51
Hennepin193919,100Urban minor arterialMinnetonka Blvd over TH 1 at 0.3 N of Jct Th 7
Washington193018,000Urban other principal arterialMnth 36 over St Croix River & Park Rd at Wisconsin State Line
Hennepin192317,960Urban minor arterialCsah 152(Wash Ave) over Bassett Creek Tunnel at 0.9 mi NW of Jct Henn Av
Ramsey193617,900Urban minor arterialMsas 158(Kellogg) over Msas 258(Exchange) at The Jct Exchange St
Anoka197217,200Urban collectorMsas 116 over BNSF RR at 0.3 mi SE of Jct Csah 1
Hennepin195217,000Urban other principal arterialTh 55 WB over UP RR at 1.4 mi SE of Jct Th 494
Steele196516,000Urban InterstateI 35 NB over US 14 at No Jct Th 14
Hennepin191615,841Urban minor arterialCedar S (CSAH 152) over Hcrra at 0.1 mi N of Lake St
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate291247,4893,162,271518,39356,000
Rural arterial699453,7944,047,96793,17454,828
Rural minor arterial1,006422,9042,535,270268,45342,909
Rural major collector1,955613,2901,857,18512529,050100,246
Rural minor collector1,325298,399484,67910212,80630,046
Rural local road5,696619,323645,54344646,35635,499
Urban Interstate435958,48416,933,636851,307473,500
Urban freeway/expressway231648,4617,971,445143585,000
Urban other principal arterial344562,0225,709,5641038,990188,290
Urban minor arterial6341,121,2347,812,4243663,310353,856
Urban collector307310,6661,644,2301713,03288,461
Urban local road378183,683811,018258,83728,434
Total13,3016,439,74953,615,232810294,1431,537,069
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement1,606$940.86,398,349684,596
Widening & rehabilitation386$64.82,268,770121,699
Rehabilitation8$2.091,04021,466
Deck rehabilitation/replacement43$35.5663,96139,888
Other structural work307$149.7746,07472,995
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X