State Bridge Profile Missouri 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile Missouri 2016
State Bridge Profile Missouri 2016 2016-02-29T10:37:46+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

Missouri Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]

  • Of the 24,398 bridges in the state, 3,222, or 13%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
  • 3,059 bridges, or 13%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.
  • Federal investment in Missouri has supported $3.5 billion for capital improvements on 2,326 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 3,071 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 767 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/statepdf/ARTBA%20Missouri%20Bridge%20Profile%202016.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;” custom_margin=”15px|||” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on % of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”11″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”4″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
St. Louis1964210,521Urban InterstateIS 270 E over CST Conway Rd at S 15 T 45 N R 5 E
St. Louis1965159,819Urban InterstateIS 270 E over UP RR, Fee Fee Cr at S 3069 T 46 N R 5 E
St. Louis1968126,747Urban InterstateIS 170 E over Rvr Des Peres at S 29 T 46 N R 6 E
St. Louis1963101,755Urban InterstateIS 55 S over Mississippi Rvr, CST Wha at S 23 T 45 N R 7 E
Platte195788,200Urban InterstateIS 29 S over Rt AA at S 33 T 51 N R 33 W
St. Louis193183,453Urban InterstateIS 270 E over Watkins Cr at S 34 T 47 N R 7 E
Clay196780,126Urban InterstateIS 435 S over Drain Dtch at S 9 T 50 N R 32 W
Clay197280,126Urban InterstateIS 435 S over Missouri Rvr, CST NE Bir at S 9 T 50 N R 32 W
St. Louis196074,892Urban InterstateIS 270 E over Rt N at S 34 T 47 N R 6 E
St. Louis196073,679Urban InterstateIS 270 W over Rt N at S 34 T 47 N R 6 E
Boone195771,641Urban InterstateIS 70 E over Lp 70 at S 2 T 48 N R 13 W
St. Louis196166,302Urban InterstateIS 270 E over Rt Ac at S 31 T 47 N R 7 E
Dunklin194761,244Rural minor collectorRt Ff S over Kinnemore Dtch at S 22 T 16 N R 7 E
St. Louis196455,925Urban InterstateIS 270 E over Mississippi Rvr at S 36 T 47 N R 7 E
St. Louis197052,608Urban InterstateIS 44 E over CST Jefferson Ave at S 27 T 45 N R 7 E
St. Louis195652,148Urban InterstateIS 64 E over CST Vandeventer Ave, Met at S 16 T 45 N R 7 E
St. Louis197051,915Urban InterstateIS 44 W over CST Thurman Ave (C at S 28 T 45 N R 7 E
St. Louis197051,915Urban InterstateIS 44 W over CST 39th St at S 28 T 45 N R 7 E
St. Louis197051,301Urban InterstateIS 44 E over CST Thurman Ave (C at S 28 T 45 N R 7 E
St. Louis196950,947Urban InterstateIS 44 W over BNSF RR at S 35 T 45 N R 6 E
Platte196750,867Urban InterstateIS 29 N over CST 56th St at S 28 T 51 N R 33 W
Platte196750,867Urban InterstateIS 29 N over Mo 45 at S 20 T 51 N R 33 W
St. Louis197050,507Urban InterstateIS 44 E over Union Pacific RR at S 20 T 45 N R 6 E
St. Louis196450,430Urban InterstateIS 55 N over CST 2nd St at S 23 T 45 N R 7 E
St. Louis196949,279Urban InterstateIS 44 E over BNSF RR at S 35 T 45 N R 6 E
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate476498,6035,748,5191825,778191,981
Rural arterial1,1761,075,9126,291,5663948,187178,071
Rural minor arterial1,134629,9912,689,8479356,755157,715
Rural major collector3,9921,365,3123,460,026638246,130433,685
Rural minor collector1,046221,107523,67615238,629196,220
Rural local road11,9161,600,098993,2511,911172,462101,929
Urban Interstate8951,894,27735,475,22450209,7232,531,344
Urban freeway/expressway590846,17110,825,1751337,298226,638
Urban other principal arterial533721,5128,448,4382650,323435,406
Urban minor arterial787773,4686,773,6445867,705458,021
Urban collector716386,1032,810,0697131,440266,172
Urban local road1,137331,8901,624,01815334,710170,081
Total24,39810,344,44485,663,4563,2221,019,1405,347,263
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement3,098$2,790.23,460,635813,325
Widening & rehabilitation1$0.04,4431,809
Rehabilitation1,830$1,647.58,599,121915,164
Deck rehabilitation/replacement0$000
Other structural work34$5.56,7438,118
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X