State Bridge Profile New Jersey 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile New Jersey 2016
State Bridge Profile New Jersey 2016 2016-02-29T10:31:23+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

New Jersey Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]

  • Of the 6,686 bridges in the state, 596, or 9%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
  • 1,714 bridges, or 26%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.
  • Federal investment in New Jersey has supported $3.3 billion for capital improvements on 661 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 488 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 284 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/statepdf/ARTBA%20New%20Jersey%20Bridge%20Profile%202016.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;” custom_margin=”15px|||” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on % of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”24″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”29″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
Union1953193,870Urban freeway/expresswayGSP NB & SB over Mill Road at 0.4 mi NE of GSP&Rt78 Jct
Essex1954180,631Urban freeway/expresswayGarden St Parkway over Third River at 3.15 N of GSP&I-280 Jct
Essex1954179,900Urban freeway/expresswayGSP over CR509,CR506,Second River at 2.4 miles north of I280
Bergen1931153,000Urban freeway/expresswayNJ 4 over Hackensack Rivr & Road at 0.27 mi E of CR 503
Hudson1939151,126Urban freeway/expresswayNJ 495 over US1&9,Paterson Plank Rd at 1.7 mi west of Lin Tunnel
Passaic1939136,000Urban other principal arterialU.S.Route 46 over Lower Notch Road at 1.2 miles west of Rt 3
Bergen1931120,000Urban other principal arterialNJ 17 over NYS & W RR at 1.5 miles south of Rt 4
Bergen1932119,340Urban other principal arterialNJ 17 over NYS & W RR Spur at 1.5 miles south of Rt 4
Hudson1929111,000Urban freeway/expresswayNJ Rt 3 over Northern Sec. & Ramp A at 0.2 mi SE of 3-495 Jct
Hunterdon1941110,375Urban InterstateI-78 over Beaver Brook at 1 mile east of Rt 31
Bergen1931108,370Urban freeway/expresswayNJ 4 over Palsd Av,Wndsr Rd&CSX RR at 3.65 MI east of Rt 17
Bergen1931106,487Urban other principal arterialRoute NJ 17 over Central Avenue at 1.5 mi south of Rte 4
Middlesex1960105,019Urban other principal arterialRoute NJ 18 over Route US 1 at 1.95 miles north of NJ Tp
Bergen1931104,269Urban freeway/expresswayNJ 4 over Teaneck Road at 4.0 mi east of NJ 17
Hudson1951102,155Urban freeway/expresswayNJ495EB &Rmps B, J over NJ 3 EB & US 1 Ramp at 2 miles west of Lincoln Tun
Bergen193196,990Urban freeway/expresswayRt 4 over Flat Rock Brook at 5.4 mi east of Rt 17
Essex195494,300Urban freeway/expresswayGarden St Pkwy NB over Third River at 1 mi S of GSP & Rt 3 Jct
Essex195293,730Urban InterstateI-280 over Martin Luther King Blvd. at 0.3 mi W of 280-21 Jct
Camden195693,130Urban InterstateI-76 over Newton Ck,Klemm Av&Conrl at 1.0 mi north of I-295 Jct
Union192992,260Urban other principal arterialUS 22 over Chestnut Street(CR626) at 0.3 mi W of GSP Jct
Bergen193190,530Urban freeway/expresswayNJ 4 over Grand Ave. (NJ 93,CR501) at 5.0 mi east of Rt 17
Essex195090,100Urban InterstateI280 over NJ 21 & Ramps C&D at 0.1 mi W of 280-21 Jct
Essex195488,943Urban freeway/expresswayGarden St Pkwy SB over Third River at 1 mi S of GSP & Rt3 Jct
Morris197087,838Urban InterstateRt I-287 over Eden Ln,Rvr&Morr&Erie RR at .85MI S.of I-287 Rt10 Jct
Middlesex197087,350Urban freeway/expresswayRoute NJ 440 over GSP & Route US 9 at Jct Rt9,Rt440, GSP
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate7895,6503,132,505158854,305
Rural arterial101163,6352,224,705119,214146,499
Rural minor arterial7836,531591,139125,013108,463
Rural major collector19762,5011,013,952248,444103,223
Rural minor collector10426,424241,34891,48318,329
Rural local road604106,661506,805807,46939,745
Urban Interstate1,0312,329,88357,476,9723946,5661,571,349
Urban freeway/expressway7831,202,15242,721,84834170,7182,531,523
Urban other principal arterial9001,288,58827,828,738115147,3593,398,380
Urban minor arterial1,168857,69215,249,60813396,5731,809,484
Urban collector658303,5124,436,1366824,187388,059
Urban local road984355,5773,362,3857013,007168,322
Total6,6866,828,806158,786,144596530,62110,337,681
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement661$3,908.411,980,465462,942
Widening & rehabilitation567$437.210,549,020271,275
Rehabilitation133$1,260.63,646,458277,154
Deck rehabilitation/replacement105$251.03,237,25498,833
Other structural work855$1,015.721,453,9381,230,496
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X