State Bridge Profile New Mexico 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile New Mexico 2016
State Bridge Profile New Mexico 2016 2016-02-29T10:30:13+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

New Mexico Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]

  • Of the 3,960 bridges in the state, 267, or 7%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
  • 359 bridges, or 9%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.
  • Federal investment in New Mexico has supported $400.3 million for capital improvements on 331 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 204 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 86 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”/state-bridge-profile-texas-2016/#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”/state-bridge-profile-texas-2016/#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/statepdf/ARTBA%20New%20Mexico%20Bridge%20Profile%202016.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;” custom_margin=”15px|||” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on % of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”35″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”41″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
Bernalillo196321,633Urban InterstateI-25 SB over NM-5 / Rio Bravo at Junction I-25/NM-5
Santa Fe196920,729Urban other principal arterialFL-4777 over Santa Fe River at Guadalupe St/Alameda/SF
Valencia197419,700Urban minor arterialMain Street Bridge (NM-6 over the Rio Grande)
Dona Ana196818,591Urban InterstateI-25 SBL over Missouri Avenue at 3.6 mi S Jct US-70/I-25
Bernalillo196916,093Urban other principal arterialFL-4048 over North Diversion Channel at 0.76 mi E of I-25
Otero193315,670Urban other principal arterialUS-54/70 over Unnamed Waterway at 4.7 mi N of US-70/Alamogo
Santa Fe195814,230Rural InterstateI-25 N/SBL over NM 3 Canoncito Exit at Exit 294 @ Canoncito
Santa Fe195713,890Rural InterstateI-25 N/SBL over Galisteo Creek at 1.25 mi S of Jct NM 50
Grant197213,695Urban other principal arterialNM-90 over San Vicente Arroyo/Road at 41.4 mi E of Jct US-70
Grant196113,695Urban other principal arterialNM-90 over Pinos Altos Creek at 0.3 mi S US-180/Silvercty
Santa Fe197612,884Urban InterstateI-25 NBL over I-25NB Off Ramp B/NM-14 at Jct of I-25 and NM-14
Grant194811,867Rural arterialUS-180 over Cameron Creek at 2.0 mi NW of NM-356/Bayard
Dona Ana197110,954Urban InterstateI-10 WB over NM-28(Ave. De Mesilla) at 5.7 M. E. I-10, Exit 135
Dona Ana197110,911Urban InterstateI-10 EB over NM-28(Ave. De. Mesilla at 5.7 M. E. I-10, Exit 135.
Torrance195810,098Rural InterstateI-40 WBL over Pintada Tributary Arroyo at 20.2 mi E Jct US-285/I-40
Dona Ana19719,792Urban InterstateI-10 EBL over Ig 1142 Ramp E at 7.4 mi E of I-10 Exit-135
Dona Ana19719,792Urban InterstateI-10 EBL over Union Avenue at 1.8 mi E Jct I-10/NM-26
San Juan19369,738Rural arterialIrr/US64/491 WB over San Juan River at US-491/US-64 In Shiprock
Torrance19589,687Rural InterstateI-40 EBL over Pintada Tributary Arroyo at 20.2 mi E Jct US-285/I-40
Santa Fe19768,898Urban InterstateI-25 SBL over I-25NBL Off Ramp B NM-14 at Jct of I-25 and NM-14
McKinley19458,706Urban minor arterialNM-610 over Little Puerco at 120' S of Hill St/Gal
Dona Ana19718,341Urban InterstateI-10 WBL over E. Union Avenue at 1.8 mi E Jct I_10/NM-26
Dona Ana19718,341Urban InterstateI-10 WBL over Ramp E of I-10 at 7.4 mi E of I-10 Exit-135
San Juan19617,586Urban other principal arterialUS-550 NBL over Hampton Arroyo at 0.70 MI North Jct NM-516
Bernalillo19717,571Urban minor arterialFL-5037 over Bear Canyon Arroyo at 0.61 mi S of Osuna Blvd
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate595236,6795,808,599133,38477,241
Rural arterial519146,2352,822,8961411,93363,732
Rural minor arterial41294,8231,024,649205,35120,211
Rural major collector537180,000965,3754613,36449,469
Rural minor collector405159,037273,9205013,77921,340
Rural local road49889,550190,2988115,76820,497
Urban Interstate279312,8718,972,977118,539124,725
Urban freeway/expressway168528,877000
Urban other principal arterial298287,7144,958,596129,115108,946
Urban minor arterial144117,5581,036,0921113,36360,190
Urban collector15163,321571,13661,69416,971
Urban local road12124,374200,46833654,245
Total3,9601,712,84726,853,88426796,655567,567
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement229$120.6795,70071,039
Widening & rehabilitation33$19.4299,26417,666
Rehabilitation1,241$527.27,336,675345,753
Deck rehabilitation/replacement70$34.4399,10359,385
Other structural work34$56.6127,01718,288
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X