State Bridge Profile New York 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile New York 2016
State Bridge Profile New York 2016 2016-02-29T10:29:27+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

New York Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]

  • Of the 17,461 bridges in the state, 1,990, or 11%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.
  • 4,698 bridges, or 27%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.1
  • Federal investment in New York has supported $17.5 billion for capital improvements on 3,481 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 1,304 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 565 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/statepdf/ARTBA%20New%20York%20Bridge%20Profile%202016.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;” custom_margin=”15px|||” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on % of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”17″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”11″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
Richmond1961182,676Urban InterstateRte I278 over Relief at I278 over The Narrows
Bronx1951169,550Urban InterstateRte I95 over Rte I895, Reloc Bronx Ri at Jct I95+I278
Kings1941165,391Urban freeway/expresswayRte 907C over Mill Basin at 7.7 mi SW I678+Belt Pkwy
Kings1962161,771Urban InterstateRte I278 over 6th Avenue, Gowanus Cana at Jct Prospect Expy & I278
Kings1939157,170Urban freeway/expresswayRte 907C over Gerritsen Inlet at 2.9 mi E Belt Pky+Ocean Py
Queens1963150,062Urban InterstateRte I495 over Rte 907M, Rte 907, Rte 9 at Jct GCP+I495
Kings1940148,616Urban InterstateKosciuszko Bridge
Bronx1932147,078Urban InterstateRte I87 over abandoned subway at 87Ix over abandoned subway
Kings1942139,882Urban freeway/expresswayRte 907C over Ocean Avenue at .9 mi E Belt Pky &Ocn Pky
Kings1942139,882Urban freeway/expresswayRte 907C over Sheepshead Bay Rd at .8 mi E Belt Pky+Ocean Pky
New York1985139,357Urban freeway/expresswayFDR Drive N/B over East River Shore at East River Shore
Kings1948134,789Urban InterstateRte I278 over Rte I278, Cadman Plaza E at 0.1 mi E Jct I278 & Brooklyn Bridge
New York1883134,174Urban freeway/expresswayBrooklyn Bridge
New York1966132,734Urban freeway/expresswayRte 907L over 34th Street, FDR Drive S at Jct FDR Drive & 34th St
New York1939131,145Urban freeway/expresswayRte 907V over Amtrak-W Side Con at 4 mi NE Route 9A+79 St
Queens1963127,289Urban InterstateRte I678 over Rte I495, LIRR, Rte I678 at Jct I495+Rte 678
Queens1948123,284Urban InterstateRte I678 over North Conduit Av at Jct Rte 678+Rte 27
Kings1957122,844Urban InterstateGrand Street Ext over Rte I278, 278I 278Ix2MR1 at 2.4 mi SW Jct I278 & I495
Kings1954122,844Urban InterstateRte I278 over Flushing Avenue at 3.3 mi SW Jct I278 + I495
Kings1944121,124Urban InterstateRte I278 over Rte I278, York Street adjacent to York Street
Westchester1983118,710Urban freeway/expresswayRte 907K over Rte 907G, Bronx River, M at 0.8 mi E Int & NYStway87I
Onondaga1968114,111Urban InterstateRte I690 over Beech Street at 0.1 MI W Jct I-690+ Teall
Onondaga1968114,111Urban InterstateRte I81 over North Townsend St, Erie at Jct of Rts I-81 SB + 5
Queens1941113,306Urban freeway/expresswayRte 907A over Totten Ave at .4 mi E Jct I295 & C I Pk
Queens1961111,425Urban InterstateThrogs Neck Bridge
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate585488,5286,437,1895053,312688,400
Rural arterial655443,4373,836,1914923,886220,406
Rural minor arterial720291,2832,475,5318633,635262,916
Rural major collector1,374456,8502,581,31914053,083276,873
Rural minor collector1,787382,7391,406,72721743,338156,644
Rural local road4,155640,7971,385,80567890,376238,816
Urban Interstate1,7123,934,17967,665,664135687,2825,897,340
Urban freeway/expressway1,1411,882,98348,135,60067198,4203,904,719
Urban other principal arterial1,1101,664,48621,301,96086135,5621,552,142
Urban minor arterial1,5611,338,16416,264,077153136,4541,369,462
Urban collector1,187564,3255,075,51614377,429608,624
Urban local road1,474705,6174,122,50118668,059287,542
Total17,46112,793,388180,688,0801,9901,600,83615,463,884
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement1,050$8,651.812,525,9501,050,202
Widening & rehabilitation14,379$50,230.0145,519,5799,601,814
Rehabilitation12$3.01,8811,791
Deck rehabilitation/replacement1,957$16,559.022,331,7192,115,737
Other structural work25$0.92,1964,232
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X