State Bridge Profile Ohio 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile Ohio 2016
State Bridge Profile Ohio 2016 2016-02-29T10:46:35+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

Ohio Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]
  • Of the 27,104 bridges in the state, 1,893, or 7%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
  • 4,278 bridges, or 16%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.
  • Federal investment in Ohio has supported $4.5 billion for capital improvements on 2,222 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 2,416 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 1,237 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/statepdf/ARTBA%20Ohio%20Bridge%20Profile%202016.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;” custom_margin=”15px|||” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on % Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”33″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”12″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
Cuyahoga1968144,240Urban InterstateI-71 over I490-Ramp-ES&I90-1463R(W at 1.36 mi. N. of Jct. US-42
Franklin1973139,740Urban InterstateI 70 over Fisher Rd at 0.83 mi W of IR670
Summit1961112,688Urban InterstateI-76 over Brown St CR-652 at 0.26 mi W of SR 8
Cuyahoga195398,104Urban InterstateI-77 over Abandoned Industrial Dr at .78 mi S. of Jct. SR-14
Summit199384,580Urban InterstateI-76 WB Off Ramp over Ramp E-7 over Ramp E-4 at 0.90 mi E of SR 8
Hamilton197072,716Urban InterstateIR 71 over Eglsn Ave;I471*SB;Sts.. at .4 mi S of IR 471
Hamilton193170,604Urban other principal arterialWestern Hills Viad over Western Hills Viaduct at west of I-75 WHV Interchg
Miami195759,350Rural InterstateIR-75 over Clayton Ext. of Peters C at .71 mi S of Jct. SR-55
Hamilton200058,035Urban InterstateIR 75 (closed) over Closed-Central Avenue at W.of Central, Betw.3 & 4
Hamilton193856,580Urban other principal arterialColumbia Parkway over IR471,Ramp,Egg,Cul at N of I471 & US50 Int
Franklin196756,200Urban minor arterialBrice Rd over Brice Rd over 70-2392 at 1.19 mi E of I-270
Cuyahoga196353,596Urban InterstateI-271 S.B. over Cr 73 (Wilson Mills) at 1.34 Mi. N. of Jct US-322
Cuyahoga196353,596Urban InterstateI-271 N.B. over Cr 73 (Wilson Mills) at 1.34 Mi. N. of Jct US-322
Franklin196051,295Urban InterstateI-71 over Frank Rd at 2.1 mi N of I270
Franklin196847,880Urban minor arterialCleveland Ave(710) over Cleveland Ave. over I-27 at 3.76 mi N of SR161
Mahoning196742,880Urban collectorVestal Road over IR 680 at 0.30 mi E of SR 711
Cuyahoga192942,365Urban other principal arterialMemphis Rd Cr 119 over Countrymans Creek at 945 east of Tiedeman Rd
Franklin196240,760Urban InterstateI-270 over Scioto Big Run at 1.40 mi W of US23
Franklin197040,760Urban InterstateP over US-23 at 6.55 mi S of Usr33
Cuyahoga198740,062Urban other principal arterialWarrensville Ctr R over Rta at 1697 N of So.Woodland Rd
Cuyahoga198840,062Urban other principal arterialWarrensville Ctr R over Rta at 1697 N of So.Woodland Rd
Franklin195139,610Urban other principal arterialDublin-Granville over Rocky Fork (Dublin-Granv at 3.42 mi E of I270
Cuyahoga190039,598Urban other principal arterialCedar Road Cr 23 over Doan Brook east of M.L.King Blvd
Lucas196838,690Urban InterstateHighway over Norfolk Southern R.R. at .25 mile N. SR 2
Lucas196838,690Urban InterstateHighway over Norfolk Southern R.R. at .25 mile N. S.R. 2
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate838903,90917,148,544127,914271,375
Rural arterial1,3921,148,26210,615,5972310,862161,271
Rural minor arterial906426,5324,417,6252610,342133,915
Rural major collector3,7991,282,7118,935,16919454,143369,267
Rural minor collector3,007558,2832,825,36225633,916158,985
Rural local road10,6781,764,6447,763,6751,002122,103389,004
Urban Interstate1,3532,519,94569,734,0163451,6381,402,410
Urban freeway/expressway7701,116,69317,200,1401365,666301,539
Urban other principal arterial8931,220,40914,117,4574491,299911,898
Urban minor arterial1,0871,080,18211,552,13873109,089839,957
Urban collector999656,9596,886,2447442,403449,096
Urban local road1,382581,2254,436,09714239,970224,933
Total27,10413,259,754175,632,0641,893639,3455,613,650
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement897$5,440.91,165,317161,346
Widening & rehabilitation120$1,291.3474,86654,951
Rehabilitation276$4,505.41,539,756292,898
Deck rehabilitation/replacement123$887.02,473,644198,480
Other structural work221$11,787.0920,58491,529
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X