State Bridge Profile Oklahoma 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile Oklahoma 2016
State Bridge Profile Oklahoma 2016 2016-02-29T10:45:44+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

Oklahoma Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]
  • Of the 23,049 bridges in the state, 3,776, or 16%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
  • 1,586 bridges, or 7%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.
  • Federal investment in Oklahoma has supported $2.1 billion for capital improvements on 2,646 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 2,447 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 361 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/statepdf/ARTBA%20Oklahoma%20Bridge%20Profile%202016.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;” custom_margin=”15px|||” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on % of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”5″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”3″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
Oklahoma196087,300Urban InterstateI-40 over Crooked Oak Creek at .8 mi E of Jct I-35
Oklahoma197377,000Urban InterstateI-44 E-S Ramp over S.H. 66 & S.H. 3 at 3.4 mi N I-40
Tulsa196770,600Urban InterstateI-244 over 73rd E Ave. at 4.74 mi E Jct I 444
Tulsa196770,600Urban InterstateI-244 over Admiral Pl. at 3.62 mi E Jct I 444
Oklahoma197264,500Urban InterstateI-240 over Crooked Creek Trib. at 0.8 mi E of Jct I-35
Oklahoma197455,650Urban InterstateI-44 NB over Independence Ave at 2.3 mi N I-240
Tulsa197250,100Urban freeway/expresswayU.S. 75 over S.W. Blvd.& R.R.at 2.2 mi N Jct I-44
Tulsa197147,200Urban InterstateI-444 over Houston Ave. at 0.4 mi E Jct I-244
Tulsa196547,100Urban freeway/expresswayU.S. 64 / S.H. 51 over Sheridan Rd. at 2.6 mi SE 21 St
Oklahoma195146,450Urban InterstateI-44 WB over Deep Fork Creek at 6.7 mi N & E Jct I40
Oklahoma195146,150Urban InterstateI-44 EB over Deep Fork Creek at 6.7 mi N & E Jct I40
Tulsa197246,000Urban InterstateI-444 over 6th St. at 0.6 mi N SH 51
Tulsa197245,300Urban InterstateI-444 Ramp over S.W.Blvrd. at 0.1 mi E Jct I-244
Oklahoma197844,350Urban InterstateI-44 EB over NW Expwy,Creek,St.at 5.6N of I-40(Belle Isle
Oklahoma197844,050Urban InterstateI-44 WB over NW Expwy, Creek, St. at 5.6N of I-40(Belle Isle
Oklahoma196243,900Urban InterstateI-235 NB over I-44 at 7.5 mi N&E of Jct I 40
Tulsa197143,200Urban collectorU.S. 75 Ramp N-W over I-444 SB at Jct I-244 & I-444
Tulsa196842,850Urban freeway/expresswayU.S. 64 / S.H. 51 over Lewis Ave at 1.0 MI E Peoria Ave
Tulsa196842,850Urban freeway/expresswayU.S. 64 / S.H. 51 over 15 St. at 1.2 mi E Peoria Ave
Tulsa196842,400Urban freeway/expresswayU.S. 64 / S.H. 51 over U.P. R.R. at 1.0 MI E Peoria Ave
Tulsa196842,400Urban freeway/expresswayU.S. 64 / S.H. 51 over Lewis Ave at 1.0 MI E Peoria Ave
Oklahoma196240,300Urban InterstateI-235 SB over I-44 at 7.5 mi N&E of Jct I 40
Tulsa196540,250Urban freeway/expresswayU.S. 64 / S.H. 51 over Sheridan Rd. at 2.6 mi SE 21 St
Oklahoma196039,000Urban InterstateI-40 EB over Crutcho Creek at 2.3 mi E of Jct I35
Oklahoma196039,000Urban InterstateI-40 EB over FAU 9440 (Se 15 St) at 2.6 mi E of Jct I35
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate601516,7008,472,7002023,229230,900
Rural arterial1,3981,078,9387,506,7303852,552160,720
Rural minor arterial1,203722,0663,616,6096661,998182,350
Rural major collector7,1252,032,4895,984,342982244,371502,814
Rural minor collector59,4904,260000
Rural local road9,5041,313,2141,736,9382,364210,330291,361
Urban Interstate502731,61519,061,2883772,0511,428,550
Urban freeway/expressway420514,57911,155,4202116,989620,950
Urban other principal arterial358365,2414,129,1611416,747181,950
Urban minor arterial695437,4554,665,3807642,311451,464
Urban collector571445,5293,394,9717443,090324,004
Urban local road667162,3251,171,0028415,210109,895
Total23,0498,329,64170,898,8003,776798,8784,484,958
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement16,601$18,772.347,004,0817,272,378
Widening & rehabilitation5,044$2,648.922,041,279627,362
Rehabilitation67$120.0279,10742,183
Deck rehabilitation/replacement0$000
Other structural work363$105.3334,94162,419
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X