State Bridge Profile Oregon 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile Oregon 2016
State Bridge Profile Oregon 2016 2016-02-29T10:45:10+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

Oregon Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]
  • Of the 8,037 bridges in the state, 417, or 5%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
  • 1,437 bridges, or 18%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.
  • Federal investment in Oregon has supported $2.1 billion for capital improvements on 535 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 611 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 51 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/statepdf/ARTBA%20Oregon%20Bridge%20Profile%202016.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;” custom_margin=”15px|||” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on % of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”42″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”32″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
Multnomah1959123,200Urban InterstateI-5 (Hwy 1) over Jantzen Ped Tunnel at 0.5 mi S of Interstate Br
Multnomah1959118,000Urban minor arterialMultnomah Blvd over Hwy 1 I-5 at 1.5 mi N of Barbur Blvd
Lane196759,600Urban Interstate1-105 (Hwy 227) over Willamette River at .8 mi E OR99W Jct
Lane196759,600Urban InterstateI-105 (Hwy 227) over Future Hwy 62 at .6 mi N OR99W Jct
Multnomah191647,000Urban other principal arterialOR 99E(Hwy 1E) over UPRR at 3.9 mi N Portland CC
Lane196144,307Urban freeway/expresswayHwy 69 (WB) over Willamette R & River Ave at 03.3 N Jct Hwy 01W
Marion195342,400Urban freeway/expresswayOR 22 (Hwy 30) WB over Willamette River in Salem
Lane196740,854Urban freeway/expresswayHwy 69 (EB) over Willamette R & River Ave at 3.3 N Jct Hwy 01W
Multnomah192533,495Urban minor arterialTacoma Street over Willamette River at Portland
Multnomah191329,371Urban other principal arterialNW Broadway Ramp over Broadway St Conn at West End Broadway Br
Multnomah190828,502Urban other principal arterialOR 99E (Hwy1E)Co over Hwy 2 & UPRR at 0.1 mi E Portland Cc
Multnomah196324,502Urban InterstateHy 1 SB to Hy 2 EB over Hwy 1 I-5 at 0.5 MI E of Portland Cc
Multnomah191024,216Urban minor arterialHwy 1W (Steel Br) over Willamette River at 0.4 mi NE Portland Cc
Josephine193118,600Urban other principal arterialUS 199 (Hwy 025)SB over Rogue River at Caveman B 6St G Pass
Multnomah196817,879Urban other principal arterialColumbia Blvd over B-79 X N. Columbia Way at N Col Blvd over N Col Way
Multnomah193416,600Urban other principal arterialOr 99W (Hwy 1W) over SW Vermont St Viaduct at 0.3 mi S of Hwy 40
Washington198116,073Urban minor arterialAllen Blvd over Hwy 144 at 0.3 mi S of Cabot St
Jackson195115,854Urban minor arterialCounty Road No 670 over Bear Cr/Fern Valley Road at 0.13 Milepost
Lincoln193415,300Urban other principal arterialUS101 (Hwy 9) over Yaquina Bay at Newport S C Limits
Yamhill195114,668Rural arterialOr 18-Hwy 483 over S Yamhill River at 060 mi SW Hwy 1W Jct
Jackson196214,500Urban minor arterialFern Valley Rd C#2 over I-5 (Hwy 1) at 7.7 mi N of Ashland Ncl
Jackson196214,300Urban minor arterialBarnett Rd over I-5 (Hwy 1) at 1.5 mi N of Medford Scl
Clackamas193613,420Urban other principal arterialHwy 1E NB over Molalla River in Canby
Lane195611,600Urban other principal arterialI-5 (Hwy 1) Co over Corp at 5 mi S of Cottage Grove
Jackson191111,500Urban other principal arterialOr 99 (Hwy 063) over Ashland Creek at 018 MI N Ashland Scl
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate360436,0695,522,608311,47613,380
Rural arterial694618,4923,909,6881213,87769,161
Rural minor arterial502323,9791,759,66397,91736,150
Rural major collector1,371539,4431,559,3936526,24485,802
Rural minor collector921225,548396,9376114,39623,240
Rural local road2,494432,194416,92218226,05420,609
Urban Interstate307938,82313,554,337413,452266,902
Urban freeway/expressway72146,4353,029,106420,072129,261
Urban other principal arterial347551,5946,390,0141536,841247,042
Urban minor arterial420456,9225,569,4052937,247320,892
Urban collector354191,6671,835,3402011,11370,925
Urban local road19580,555572,650134,9134,486
Total8,0374,941,72144,516,064417223,6021,287,850
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement356$426.01,232,451220,620
Widening & rehabilitation1,135$2,849.412,072,1601,221,989
Rehabilitation12$4.23,0213,094
Deck rehabilitation/replacement4$0.31,551543
Other structural work325$194.617,27662,929
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X