State Bridge Profile Rhode Island 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile Rhode Island 2016
State Bridge Profile Rhode Island 2016 2016-02-29T10:43:46+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

Rhode Island Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]
  • Of the 766 bridges in the state, 178, or 23%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
  • 251 bridges, or 33%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.
  • Federal investment in Rhode Island has supported $930.5 million for capital improvements on 325 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 53 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 45 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/statepdf/ARTBA%20Rhode%20Island%20Bridge%20Profile%202016.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;” custom_margin=”15px|||” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on % of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”1″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”45″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
Providence1965186,500Urban InterstateI-95 NB & SB over US 1 Elmwood Av at 0.6 mi N of Jct RI 10
Providence1964179,600Urban other principal arterialBroad St over I-95 NB & SB & P&W RR at 1.5 mi N of Jct US 1
Providence1964159,200Urban InterstateI-95 NB & SB over Amtrak at 1.5 mi S of Jct US 1A
Kent1966156,400Urban InterstateI-95 NB & SB over Jefferson Blvd at 0.3 mi N of Jct I-95+295
Providence1964147,934Urban InterstateI-95 NB & SB over Wellington Av at 0.2 mi N of Jct RI 10
Providence1968124,000Urban minor arterialRI 51 Phenix Av over I-295 NB at 1.25 mi S of Jct RI 5
Providence196976,700Urban InterstateI-195 WB over Seekonk River at 0.2 mi W of Jct US 6
Providence195772,800Urban freeway/expresswayRI 146 Ed Dowl Hwy over RI 15 Mineral Spring Av at 0.8 mi S of Jct Chrles St
Providence195672,800Urban freeway/expresswayRI 146 Ed Dowl Hwy over RI 246 Charles St at 0.5 mi N of Jct RI 15
Providence196952,678Urban minor arterialUS 6 EB & WB over US 6A Hartford Av at 1.0 mi W of Jct RI 10
Providence195148,800Urban freeway/expresswayUS 6 Olneyvlle Exp over Westminster,Troy,Amtrak at 0.1 mi W of Jct RI 10
Washington198848,700Urban freeway/expresswayRI 4 NB & SB over Lafayette Rd at 0.7 mi S of Jct RI 2
Providence194242,600Urban freeway/expresswayRI 146 Ed Dowl Hwy over RI 116 George Wash Hwy at 1.5 mi W of Jct RI 122
Washington196941,200Urban freeway/expresswayUS 1 Tower Hill Rd over RI 138 at 0.5 mi S of Jct RI 4
Providence197339,800Urban minor arterialDean St over Woonasquatucket River at 0.1 mi W of Jct Bath St
Providence196938,600Urban InterstateI-295 SB over RI 14 Plainfield Pike at I-295 @ Exit 4
Providence196835,300Urban InterstateI-295 NB over Water Supply Aquaduct at 2.0 mi S of Scituate Av
Providence196534,000Urban freeway/expresswayRI 37 EB & WB over Power Road at 1.0 mi W of Jct I-95
Providence196834,000Urban freeway/expresswayRI 37 EB & WB over Cranston St at 0.5 MI E of Jct Natick Av
Providence196531,600Urban freeway/expresswayRI 37 EB & WB over Pontiac Av at 0.7 mi E of Jct RI 2
Providence195630,000Urban freeway/expresswayRI 146 Ed Dowl Hwy over Cobble Hill Rd at 2.0 mi S of Jct RI 123
Providence197030,000Urban InterstateI-295 SB over RI 5 Greenville Av at 0.5MI FM Atwood
Providence196529,200Urban other principal arterialRI 37 EB & WB over RI 2 New London Av at Jct of RI 2 & RI 37
Kent197629,074Urban other principal arterialRI 113 Main Av over US 1 Post Rd at 1.0 mi E of Jct RI 5
Providence195828,889Urban freeway/expresswayRI 146 N Smfld Exp over Pound Hill Rd at 2.0 mi N of Jct RI 104
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate115,342286,693261948,800
Rural arterial156,888159,06622,34617,785
Rural minor arterial92,26645,6401644,800
Rural major collector237,385119,63872,77223,418
Rural minor collector226,80533,0041461,800
Rural local road303,20216,460121,1054,600
Urban Interstate132213,9717,728,5951933,9281,010,934
Urban freeway/expressway117238,6472,853,5203338,667783,068
Urban other principal arterial124122,8532,115,0663126,332654,275
Urban minor arterial147118,1631,866,7953645,099595,981
Urban collector8440,440425,809168,58861,983
Urban local road5217,297153,130184,15536,210
Total766783,25915,803,416178163,7213,243,654
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement3$6.18,000933
Widening & rehabilitation0$000
Rehabilitation714$2,759.314,893,118703,320
Deck rehabilitation/replacement0$000
Other structural work2$0.13,0503,633
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X