State Bridge Profile South Dakota 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile South Dakota 2016
State Bridge Profile South Dakota 2016 2016-02-29T10:59:02+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

South Dakota Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]
  • Of the 5,866 bridges in the state, 1,156, or 20%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
  • 232 bridges, or 4%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.
  • Federal investment in South Dakota has supported $463.0 million for capital improvements on 1,065 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 409 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 30 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/statepdf/ARTBA%20South%20Dakota%20Bridge%20Profile%202016.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;” custom_margin=”15px|||” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on % of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”4″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”19″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
Lincoln195823,630Urban InterstateI029 N over I229 S & I029 S Off Ramp at I 29 & I 229 Interchange
Lincoln195823,630Urban InterstateI029 S over I229 S & I029 S Off Ramp at I 29 & I 229 Interchange
Minnehaha196522,694Urban other principal arterialWest 12th Street over Ellis and Eastern RR at 12th St-W. Grange Ave -SF
Minnehaha197918,174Urban collector49th Street over Big Sioux Rv at 49th St-W of Kiwanis - SF
Minnehaha197313,400Urban minor arterialS. Cliff Avenue over Big Sioux Rv at Cliff Ave S of 12th - SF
Pennington195911,260Urban InterstateI090 E over Boxelder Ck at 0.6 SE Meade Co Line
Lawrence197110,980Urban minor arterialUS014A over I090 at US 14A Interchange
Lawrence196710,445Rural arterialUS014A, Pine St over Whitewood Ck at Jct US 85 S
Minnehaha191210,163Urban collector8th Street over Big Sioux Rv at 8th E of Phillips Ave -SF
Minnehaha19489,815Urban minor arterial60th St N (SD38A) over Silver Ck at 60th N 1/4 mi W Minn - SF
Meade19578,490Rural InterstateI090 W over Chimney Canyon Rd at N Piedmont Interchange
Minnehaha19757,850Urban collectorSixth Street over Big Sioux Rv at 6th E of Phillips Ave -SF
Minnehaha19606,535Rural InterstateI090 W over Split Rock Ck at 0.4 E SD 11 Interch
Lawrence19535,155Rural arterialUS014A over Deadwood Ck at 2 N Jct US 85
Brown19695,087Urban minor arterial3rd Avenue SE over Moccasin Ck at 3rd Ave SE - Aberdeen
Codington19414,837Urban minor arterial3rd Ave N Wtn over Big Sioux Rv at 3rd Ave N - Watertown
Pennington19744,700Urban collectorChapel Lane over Rapid Ck at Chapel Lane & Sd44 - Rc
Minnehaha19633,545Rural major collector463 Ave (Fas 6353) over I090 at 2.8 W SD 38 Interchange
Minnehaha19533,485Rural minor arterialSd115 over South Fork Sioux Rv at 0.5 S of Dell Rapids
Minnehaha19673,485Rural minor arterialSd115 over Ck at 0.1 W of Dell Rapids
Minnehaha19633,320Rural minor arterialSd115 over I029 at SD 115 & I29 Interchange
Minnehaha19613,300Urban collectorE 60th St N over I229 at 0.3 S I 90 Interch
Edmunds19743,040Rural arterialUS012 over Ck at 4.2 E of Ipswich
Deuel19713,010Rural arterialUS212 over Caine Ck at 1.1 W Jct SD 15 N
Clay19492,635Rural minor arterialSd046 over Vermillion Rv at 0.2 E Jct SD 19 S
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate337192,3571,644,08932,47915,031
Rural arterial454227,993907,8171512,88334,605
Rural minor arterial522203,432616,1382110,98326,815
Rural major collector1,158315,300415,42819449,00661,123
Rural minor collector16144,78422,889396,6456,341
Rural local road2,831371,852210,36885184,69653,651
Urban Interstate118104,8091,495,59443,75259,530
Urban freeway/expressway811,89768,870000
Urban other principal arterial7183,518813,92011,64522,694
Urban minor arterial8869,032608,20075,51046,399
Urban collector5127,650200,046107,17049,285
Urban local road6713,67163,384112,4813,408
Total5,8661,666,2957,066,7431,156187,250378,882
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement1,414$766.3763,079287,686
Widening & rehabilitation5$3.051,5302,857
Rehabilitation311$14.2135,71285,158
Deck rehabilitation/replacement54$7.9123,42433,720
Other structural work750$23.0255,839116,080
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X