State Bridge Profile Virginia 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile Virginia 2016
State Bridge Profile Virginia 2016 2016-02-29T10:53:36+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

Virginia Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]
  • Of the 13,884 bridges in the state, 1,063, or 8%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
  • 2,517 bridges, or 18%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.
  • Federal investment in Virginia has supported $3.0 billion for capital improvements on 1,779 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 802 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 434 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/statepdf/ARTBA%20Virginia%20Bridge%20Profile%202016.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″ background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px|||” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;”]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on % of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”32″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”21″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
Virginia Beach1967133,892Urban InterstateIS 264 over Lynnhaven Pkwy at 1.72 mi from Int Rte 411
Chesterfield195896,759Urban InterstateInterstate-95 over Rte 608 (Reymet Rd) at 1.21 from 288 & .72 to 613
Arlington196595,402Urban InterstateCustis Mem. Hwy. over Rmps B & F at 1.11 from 29/01. to Constitu
Richmond195891,074Urban InterstateInterstate-95 over Deepwater Term Ser. Rd at 2.87 from SCL & 2.43 to 360
Alexandria197388,025Urban InterstateNBL Route 0395 over & Rmp F O Four Mile Run at 01 from 7/.2 to 120
Richmond197585,749Urban InterstateRoute 195 over Hamilton Street at 0.25 from 33 & 0.28 to 197
Norfolk196774,756Urban InterstateIS 64 EBL over US 13 Northampton Blvd at 1.08 mi from Rte. 165
Richmond196771,500Urban InterstateWBL Route 64 over Rte I 195 NBL & Ramp B at .36 from WCL & .27 to 95
Roanoke196571,353Urban InterstateRoutes 581, 220 over Rtes. 11, 116 & 460 at 2.83-Rte101; 0.43-Rte11
Roanoke196371,353Urban InterstateLiberty Road over Rtes. 581,220 at 0.11-Hunt Ave; .09-Lukens
Richmond197571,000Urban InterstateSBl Route 0195 over Rte 76 , CSX RR , Ramp S at .05 from 147 & .04 to 76
Stafford196368,231Urban InterstateNBL Rte. I-95 over Rte. 17 at 1.2M Spotsy.-6.9M Rte630
Arlington194467,000Urban InterstateWashington Blvd. over Columbia Pike at .86Fr50/.33To395
Fairfax196163,000Urban other principal arterialLeesburg Pike over Route 267 & Dar at .47 684 / .70 694
Arlington194255,615Urban freeway/expresswayWashington Blvd. over Rte. 110 (Jeff Davis Hwy at .55Fr244 .26To Dc
Norfolk196752,038Urban other principal arterialIS 64 EBL Ramp over US 13 Northampton Blvd at 0.75 mi from Rte. 13 SBl
Alexandria196949,980Urban other principal arterialDuke Street over Route I-395 at 0.32Fr401 0.25Tofairfx Cl
Stafford196349,500Urban InterstateSBl Rte. I-95 over Rte. 17 at 1.2M Spotsy.-6.9M Rte630
Richmond196748,110Urban InterstateInterstate-64 EBL over CSX,Hospitalst&Valleyrd at 0.56 from 95 & 1.33 to 360
Richmond196948,110Urban InterstateEBl Route 64 over Rte 95,4th & 5th Streets at .17 from 95 & 1.75 to Ecl
Alexandria197046,040Urban other principal arterialKing Street over Route I-395, Ramps C&G at .78Fr402/.96Towcl Alx
Fairfax198545,234Urban minor arterialGallows Road over Arlington Blvd. at .59Fr3454/.15To495
Hampton197443,842Urban InterstateIS 64 EBL S Appr over Hampton Roads at South Approach Hrbt
Newport News196543,341Urban minor arterialDenbigh Blvd over IS 64 & CSX Railroad at 0.53 MI from Rte 143
Richmond196742,500Urban InterstateWBL Route 64 over CSXt,Hospitalst&Vall at 0.41 from 95 & 1.33 to 360
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate669621,13412,740,6622329,009383,064
Rural arterial6501,085,1105,772,1632642,153210,855
Rural minor arterial895567,0944,264,6926132,268254,813
Rural major collector2,072738,6183,769,53215952,443328,479
Rural minor collector585148,973449,483407,10623,746
Rural local road4,566722,7721,950,27251854,282134,413
Urban Interstate1,0332,105,14750,311,5403374,7321,626,372
Urban freeway/expressway428745,3599,044,904710,648188,327
Urban other principal arterial7201,252,67616,857,8224984,0161,133,690
Urban minor arterial833830,89811,669,1974752,494563,428
Urban collector527317,8423,308,3663715,839176,284
Urban local road906346,6093,238,1386314,463173,621
Total13,8849,482,232123,376,7681,063469,4535,197,092
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement2,251$3,323.512,847,0551,310,117
Widening & rehabilitation515$339.15,141,467656,441
Rehabilitation2,777$2,221.437,409,5191,782,490
Deck rehabilitation/replacement74$31.21,265,54791,818
Other structural work1,050$1,970.08,361,458622,118
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X