State Bridge Profile West Virginia 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile West Virginia 2016
State Bridge Profile West Virginia 2016 2016-02-29T11:06:28+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

West Virginia Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]
  • Of the 7,215 bridges in the state, 1,092, or 15%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
  • 1,462 bridges, or 20%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.
  • Federal investment in West Virginia has supported $1.7 billion for capital improvements on 780 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 725 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 61 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/statepdf/ARTBA%20West%20Virginia%20Bridge%20Profile%202016.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;” custom_margin=”15px|||” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on % of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”8″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”20″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
Kanawha197453,000Urban InterstateI-77 NB & SB over Westmoreland Road at 0.54 mi N of I-64
Kanawha197445,000Urban InterstateI-77 NB & SB over Cora Street at 0.78 mi N of I-64
Harrison197739,500Urban other principal arterialUS Route 50 over WV 20 & WV 20 Conn. at 0.55 mi west WV Rt 20
Harrison197434,900Urban other principal arterialUS Route 50 over Interstate 79 at 0.43 mi west Co Rt 50/16
Ohio197028,374Urban InterstateInterstate 70 West over US 40 at Jct I-70 & US 40
Ohio197028,374Urban InterstateInterstate 70 over Mid.Whg Ck,US 40,City St at Jct I-70 and US 40
Ohio196826,083Urban InterstateInterstate 70 over Middle Creek & CR39 at 1.42 mi. east Jct US 40
Ohio196826,083Urban InterstateInterstate 70 over Middle Creek & CR 39 at 1.42 mi. east Jct. US 40
Kanawha197226,000Urban InterstateI-77 NB over CR 119/37 at 1. mi N of I-79
Ohio196525,500Urban InterstateInterstate 70 WB over Wheeling Creek at 0.69 mi. east Jct US40
Ohio196525,250Urban InterstateInterstate 70 EB over Big Wheeling Creek at 0.69 mi East US 40
Ohio196625,250Urban InterstateInterstate 70 EB over Wheeling Creek & City St at 0.35 mi. east Jct US 40
Marshall194323,300Urban other principal arterialWest Virginia 2 over Little Grave Creek at 0.30 Mi. No. Jct Cr250/88
Ohio196623,223Urban InterstateInterstate 70 WB over Wheeling Creek & City St at 0.35 mi. east Jct. US 40
Ohio196522,728Rural InterstateInterstate 70 EB over County Route 41 at Jct I-70 and Cr 41
Kanawha197222,500Urban InterstateI-77 SBL over CR 119/37 at 1. mi N of I-79
Monongalia196722,500Rural InterstateInterstate 79 SB over Interstate 79 at 1.84 mi South Co Rt 77
Marion196622,050Urban InterstateInterstate 79 SB over WV 310 at 1.70 MI North Co Rt 64/2
Cabell195822,000Urban InterstateI 64 over County Route 60/89 at 1.69 mi east of Cr 19
Marion196822,000Urban InterstateInterstate 79 SB over Marion County Rt. 33 at 2.13 mi North WV Rt 310
Cabell195822,000Urban InterstateI 64 over County Route 60/89 at 1.69 miles east of Cr 19
Monongalia196721,600Rural InterstateInterstate 79 NB over Mon. Co. Rt. 77 at 3.16 MI South I-68
Cabell195921,250Urban InterstateI 64 WB over Interstate 64 at 1.78 MI west of Cr 60/89
Cabell195921,250Urban InterstateI 64 EB over Interstate 64 EBL at 1.78 MI west of Cr 60/89
Ohio195821,000Urban InterstateInterstate 70 EB over Mt. Dechantal Road at 1.33 Mi. East Jct US 40
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate405470,8005,580,1592624,970389,816
Rural arterial424675,4262,753,8594235,968219,650
Rural minor arterial349195,3021,168,8417432,695215,753
Rural major collector1,501429,6732,318,33425055,288368,430
Rural minor collector49890,520310,230657,23135,930
Rural local road2,969412,836682,16345247,88981,909
Urban Interstate249586,6876,285,0723560,203752,487
Urban freeway/expressway71184,447867,89636,51625,700
Urban other principal arterial127266,0481,900,8002131,329287,050
Urban minor arterial210232,7561,827,7863919,818312,550
Urban collector13371,817549,360208,68089,460
Urban local road27992,053346,0706515,32468,030
Total7,2153,708,36524,590,5701,092345,9112,846,765
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement1,982$1,788.03,186,738381,196
Widening & rehabilitation263$125.0642,85169,435
Rehabilitation450$306.02,552,725385,472
Deck rehabilitation/replacement594$360.05,169,742778,875
Other structural work76$16.4242,306125,220
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X