State Bridge Profile Wisconsin 2016

Home/State Bridge Profile Wisconsin 2016
State Bridge Profile Wisconsin 2016 2016-02-29T11:05:52+00:00
[et_pb_section admin_label=”Section” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”on” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ specialty_columns=”3″][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” custom_padding=”||0px|” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”off” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off”][et_pb_column_inner type=”4_4″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Main Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”15px||0px|” custom_padding=”||10px|” text_line_height=”1.8em”]

Wisconsin Highlights from FHWA’s
2015 National Bridge Inventory Data:

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bullet Points” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid”]
  • Of the 14,134 bridges in the state, 1,282, or 9%, are classified as structurally deficient. This means one or more of the key bridge elements, such as the deck, superstructure or substructure, is considered to be in “poor” or worse condition.1
  • 742 bridges, or 5%, are classified as functionally obsolete. This means the bridge does not meet design standards in line with current practice.
  • Federal investment in Wisconsin has supported $2.3 billion for capital improvements on 2,259 bridge projects between 2005 and 2014.2
  • Since 2004, 1,431 new bridges have been constructed in the state; 234 have undergone major reconstruction.
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Shareaholic” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19055″]<center>[shareaholic app="share_buttons" id="5471712"]</center>[/et_pb_code][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][et_pb_row_inner admin_label=”Row” padding_mobile=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” make_equal=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”off” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”off” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”off” gutter_width=”4″][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Data Button” button_url=”#inventory” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Bridge Inventory Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Button” button_url=”#proposed” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”View Proposed Bridge Work Data” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][et_pb_column_inner type=”1_3″ saved_specialty_column_type=”3_4″][et_pb_cta admin_label=”Download PDF Button” button_url=”http://www.artba.org/statepdf/ARTBA%20Wisconsin%20Bridge%20Profile%202016.pdf” url_new_window=”on” button_text=”Download Report” use_background_color=”off” background_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”17″ button_text_color=”#ffffff” button_bg_color=”#002a3f” button_letter_spacing=”0″ button_use_icon=”default” button_icon_placement=”right” button_on_hover=”on” button_letter_spacing_hover=”0″ custom_margin=”0px|||” custom_padding=”0px|||” custom_css_promo_button=”min-height:70px;||min-width:95%;”] [/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column_inner][/et_pb_row_inner][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Ranking Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” custom_css_main_element=”font-size: 30px;” custom_margin=”15px|||” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19053″]

Ranking

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on the # Percentage of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on % of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”21″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][et_pb_number_counter admin_label=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” title=”Based on # of Structurally Deficient Bridges” number=”17″ percent_sign=”off” counter_color=”#004064″ background_layout=”light” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#d8d8d8″ border_style=”solid” custom_padding=”10px||10px|” custom_css_main_element=”border: 0px solid #ededed;||border-radius: 8px;” background_color=”#f7f7f7″] [/et_pb_number_counter][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”off” custom_padding=”0px|||” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”on” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=” Top Traveled Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19050″]

Top Most Traveled Structurally Deficient Bridges in the State

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 1 – Top Traveled”]
CountyYear BuiltDaily CrossingsType of Bridge3Location
Waukesha1960118,000Urban InterstateIH 94 over Br Poplar Creek at 3.4 mi E Jct USH 18 to E
Dane1957110,000Urban freeway/expresswayUSH 12-USH 14-W Be over USH 18 WB-USH 151 SB at 0.3 mi E Jct USH 18 to W
St. Croix197261,790Urban InterstateIH 94-USH 12-Sth 3 over Sth 35 SB at 0.6 mi E Minn State Line
St. Croix197256,800Urban InterstateIH 94-USH 12-Sth 3 over Lrd Front St at 0.2 mi E Jct Sth 35 to N
Milwaukee196537,700Urban InterstateIH 43 SB-USH 45 SB over Sth 1-S 108th St at 0.8 mi S Jct IH 894 (D)
Racine195935,580Rural InterstateIH 94 EB-USH 41 SB over Sth 11 at 2.0 mi E Jct Sth 20
Racine195933,680Rural InterstateIH 94 EB-USH 41 SB over Sth 20 at 6.0 mi E Jct Cth G to E
Dunn195933,200Rural InterstateIH 94 over E Br Wilson Creek at 8.9 mi E Jct Cth Q to N
Dane196028,500Rural InterstateIH 39 NB IH 90 & 9 over Lrd Cuba Valley Rd at 2.4 mi W Jct Sth 19 to E
Dane196027,800Rural InterstateIH 90 EB-IH 94 EB over Lrd Cuba Valley Rd at 2.3 mi E Jct Cth V to E
Columbia196126,100Rural InterstateIH 39/90/94 NB over Sth 60 at 7.2M W Jct Cth V to E
Rock196123,800Rural InterstateIH 90 EB over Lrd Newville Rd at 2.1 Mi.E of Sth 59
Rock196123,600Rural InterstateIH 90 EB over Cmstpp RR at 3.7 mi E Jct Sth 59 to E
Portage196923,100Urban InterstateIH Ush51-Ih39NB over Lrd Reserve St at 1.7M N Jct Sth 66 to E
St. Croix195822,900Rural InterstateIH 94 EB over Carr Creek at 4.7 mi E Jct USH 63 to N
St. Croix195822,900Rural InterstateIH 94 WB over Carr Creek at 0.3M W Jct Cth B to N
Rock196122,550Urban InterstateIH 90 EB over USH 14 at 0.9 Mi.E of Sth 26
Dane196122,200Rural InterstateIH 39/90 SB over Lrd Church Rd at 7.0 mi E Jct Cth N to W
Milwaukee195921,600Urban minor arterialLrd S 76th St over Honey Creek at 0.1M N Jct Cth Nn
Waukesha195921,140Urban other principal arterialCth X (Genesee Rd) over Pebble Creek at 0.2M N Jct Sth 59
Milwaukee196421,100Urban minor arterialLrd W Locust St over IH 43-N-S Freeway at 0.6 mi E Jct Sth 57
Milwaukee195620,850Urban minor arterialCth Ee W Hampton over Lincoln Creek at 0.2 mi E Jct Sth 145
Waukesha196420,000Rural InterstateIH 94 EB over Lrd Dousman Rd at 0.5 MI W Jct Sth 67
Waukesha196420,000Rural InterstateIH 94 WB over Lrd Dousman Rd at 0.7M W Jct Sth 67
Jefferson194019,800Rural InterstateIH 94 WB over Johnson Creek at 5.4 mi W Jct Cth F to N
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Bridge Inventory Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”inventory” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19051″]

Bridge Inventory

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 2 – Bridge Inventory Table”]
Type of Bridge3Number of BridgesArea of All Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on All BridgesNumber of Structurally Deficient BridgesArea of Structurally Deficient Bridges (sq. meters)Daily Crossings on Structurally Deficient Bridges
Rural Interstate607445,65710,694,9252815,186568,015
Rural arterial1,138755,2739,764,5403219,935147,302
Rural minor arterial1,127497,2374,264,8365215,505198,220
Rural major collector1,814536,6562,928,34922852,834282,045
Rural minor collector715161,384625,19210522,66072,869
Rural local road5,842911,3902,175,82067069,606128,520
Urban Interstate522928,93717,931,4561111,125383,740
Urban freeway/expressway353476,9919,703,99742,629134,410
Urban other principal arterial618812,45211,147,3382219,480250,433
Urban minor arterial637651,8046,920,4095851,214534,581
Urban collector208132,3281,171,6492410,35667,581
Urban local road553273,2952,170,7574811,73887,155
Total14,1346,583,40479,499,2641,282302,2682,854,871
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Proposed Bridge Work Header” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font=”|on|||” text_font_size=”28″ text_text_color=”#004064″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” module_id=”proposed” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19052″]

Proposed Bridge Work

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_code admin_label=”Table 3 – Proposed Bridge Work”]
Type of WorkNumber of BridgesCost to Repair (in millions)Daily CrossingsArea of Bridges (sq. meters)
Bridge replacement2,016$1,523.711,857,568988,920
Widening & rehabilitation0$000
Rehabilitation1$0.1214202
Deck rehabilitation/replacement15$0.313,8302,983
Other structural work6$0.11,382628
[/et_pb_code][et_pb_text admin_label=”Footnotes” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19048″]

1 According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), a bridge is classified as structurally deficient if the condition rating for the deck, superstructure, substructure or culvert and retaining walls is rated 4 or below or if the bridge receives an appraisal rating of 2 or less for structural condition or waterway adequacy. During inspections, the condition of a variety of bridge elements are rated on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition). A rating of 4 is considered “poor” condition and the individual element displays signs of advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
2 This data is provided by bridge owners as part of the FHWA data and is required for any bridge eligible for the Highway Bridge Replacement

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Sources” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” text_font_size=”10″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” saved_tabs=”all” global_module=”19049″]

Sources: All data is from the 2014 National Bridge Inventory, released by the Federal Highway Administration in January 2015. Note that specific conditions on bridge may have changed as a result of recent work. Cost estimates of bridge work provided as part of the data and have been adjusted to 2014$ for inflation and estimated project costs. Contract awards data is for state and local government awards and comes from McGraw Hill. Note that additional bridge investment may be a part of other contract awards if a smaller bridge project is included with a highway project, and that would not be accounted for in the total in this profile.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
X