What happened: ARTBA and industry allies Sept. 18 urged the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to clarify the meaning of properly fit and additional hazards in the agency’s rule making on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in Construction. The group also asked for more specificity to better understand their compliance obligations.

Why it matters: OSHA’s proposed rule requires employers to provide PPE that is given to comfort and fit. ARTBA is concerned with the rule’s vague language, noting nothing in the proposal demonstrates how investigators will evaluate PPE for compliance. The proposal is unclear whether proper fit will be checked by investigators during inspections or site visits, and what factors will be considered when determining compliance.

What’s next: OSHA will review comments submitted by industry stakeholders. Members interested in following developments on this proposed regulation may contact ARTBA’s Brad Sant or Prianka Sharma.

Related News

April 14, 2026

Change to Inspection Guidance for Heat Hazards

What happened: OSHA April 10 updated its National Emphasis Program (NEP) on outdoor and…

Learn More
March 27, 2026

Missouri Teens Want Others to Know What’s at Stake in Work Zones

What’s happening: Teens from 10 Missouri high schools helped kick off a new safety…

Learn More
March 20, 2026

Senators Call On OSHA to Drop Heat Rule

What’s happening: Sixteen Republican Senators led by Health, Education, Labor & Pensions Committee Chairman Bill…

Learn More