ARTBA and its coalition partners filed comments regarding the Environmental Protections Agency’s (EPA) draft guidance on application of the Supreme Court’s decision in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund as it relates to discharges from point sources to jurisdictional surface water through groundwater, noting there is little (if any) direction to permitting authorities or regulated parties on what constitutes a covered discharge to navigable waters (e.g., waters of the United States (“WOTUS”) through groundwater under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”).

The comments noted that EPA fails to provide needed clarity to regulators or the regulated community; creates new confusion in significant areas; and is contrary to County of Maui and the CWA.

Accordingly, the coalition requests that EPA reconsider the draft guidance in its entirety, consistent with the comments above; engage stakeholders; and repropose new draft guidance for public review and comment.

Related Resources

Comments Supporting GDOT Application for NEPA Assignment

ARTBA submitted comments to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) strongly supporting the Georgia…

Learn More

Comments to EPA on Supplemental WOTUS Proposal

ARTBA submitted comments to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Army…

Learn More

Comments to FHWA Supporting VA NEPA Assignment

ARTBA submitted a letter to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) strongly supporting the…

Learn More